Ścianka
Wall
Trez Mackenzie@SCM Data suggestions
Thread started by StuMassey
The post is under;
Sturmpanzer IV "Brummbär" Sd.Kfz 166 II. Serie
w/interior
HobbyBoss | No. 80135 | 1:35
But has nothing to do with the kit aside from Kursk. Okay, storm in a teacup but things can start getting messy if irrelevant posts start sprouting up
I tried to explain but to no avail 🤦♂️
The post is under;
Sturmpanzer IV "Brummbär" Sd.Kfz 166 II. Serie
w/interior
HobbyBoss | No. 80135 | 1:35
But has nothing to do with the kit aside from Kursk. Okay, storm in a teacup but things can start getting messy if irrelevant posts start sprouting up
I tried to explain but to no avail 🤦♂️
26 April, 02:16
Trez Mackenzie
I think the explanation must have made him see sense. And that's cool by me - no dramas! Cheers!
I think the explanation must have made him see sense. And that's cool by me - no dramas! Cheers!
26 April, 20:09
Tini Hendriks@SCM Data suggestions
Hello, like the previous caller, here the same.
With the Meng British RR Armored Car (MSG-VS010)
On the upper companies it is on sale at AK for € 27,65 and on their original AK-site it is €39,50.
At Super Hobby it is on Your site €13,10, but on the Super Hobby site it is actually € 50,18
A pity because I use that a lot to order, what was till now a trustfull advice..
With regards,
Tini
With the Meng British RR Armored Car (MSG-VS010)
On the upper companies it is on sale at AK for € 27,65 and on their original AK-site it is €39,50.
At Super Hobby it is on Your site €13,10, but on the Super Hobby site it is actually € 50,18
A pity because I use that a lot to order, what was till now a trustfull advice..
With regards,
Tini
1 26 April, 11:58
Spanjaard@SCM Data suggestions
Flak Tower IV Heiligengeistfeld G Tower (Takom 6005, 1:350) in the stores section, Super-hobby shows 12.97 as price, but when you visit the site, the price appears as 49.65
1 26 April, 08:26
April 24, 2024
Eddie Mann@SCM Data suggestions
Could you please rename:
railwaymates.com/topics/topic.php?id=107007
TO:
Hopper wagons
Hoppers is a bit vague.
railwaymates.com/topics/topic.php?id=107007
TO:
Hopper wagons
Hoppers is a bit vague.
Wdrożone
1 23 April, 17:03
Eddie Mann@SCM Data suggestions
Could you please rename:
SCM Topic: Northrop N-3PB Nomad
TO:
Northrop N-3PB Nomad
I don't think there was a Northrop N-3.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_N-3PB_Nomad
SCM Topic: Northrop N-3PB Nomad
TO:
Northrop N-3PB Nomad
I don't think there was a Northrop N-3.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_N-3PB_Nomad
Wdrożone
1 23 April, 15:06
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Nakajima Ki-43-II Hayabusa C..Design Models RM48005, 1:48)
Ki-43 II / III control surfa..esign Models RM480005, 1:48)
The product is the same. The correct product number is RM48005 per the packaging. The only place I see it as RM480005 is the vendor The48ers.com. The picture they have on their site shows the product number as RM48005.
Nakajima Ki-43-II Hayabusa C..Design Models RM48005, 1:48)
Ki-43 II / III control surfa..esign Models RM480005, 1:48)
The product is the same. The correct product number is RM48005 per the packaging. The only place I see it as RM480005 is the vendor The48ers.com. The picture they have on their site shows the product number as RM48005.
Wdrożone
2 23 April, 19:11
April 23, 2024
Roman Modelar@SCM Data suggestions
Please could you add a new color range "Evangelion Color Series" for gaianotes ? (like Frame Arms Girl)
Thnks
Thnks
Wdrożone
1 23 April, 12:32
April 22, 2024
Jon Ruehle@SCM Data suggestions
Add "Mikr Mir" as a manufacturer as well as their 1/72 Blackburn Beverly kit. I can't figure out how to add the box art to this message.
Wdrożone
21 April, 17:35
Jon Ruehle
Hi Eddie,
Yes. That is it. I found that mfg a few minutes after posting this message. The name is not spelled out on the box. It's a stylized logo name, like this Micr O Mir, where the "O" is not really an "O" but rather a perfect circle, with a micrometer and a jet inside of the circle.
1. I couldn't figure out how to delete this message
2. I couldn't figure out how to add the Blackburn Beverly as a new kit, there's one field that it would not let me get past
3. Now, with your help I have found both, and realized that I was spelling "Beverly" incorrectly. It's "B e v e r L E Y". Bloody Brits!
And now I see they have and Argosy! So Ill need to ad one of those to the collection! Thanks!
Thank you!
--Jon
Hi Eddie,
Yes. That is it. I found that mfg a few minutes after posting this message. The name is not spelled out on the box. It's a stylized logo name, like this Micr O Mir, where the "O" is not really an "O" but rather a perfect circle, with a micrometer and a jet inside of the circle.
1. I couldn't figure out how to delete this message
2. I couldn't figure out how to add the Blackburn Beverly as a new kit, there's one field that it would not let me get past
3. Now, with your help I have found both, and realized that I was spelling "Beverly" incorrectly. It's "B e v e r L E Y". Bloody Brits!
And now I see they have and Argosy! So Ill need to ad one of those to the collection! Thanks!
Thank you!
--Jon
22 April, 09:27
April 21, 2024
Vicente Sánchez Navarro@SCM Data suggestions
Hello, would it be possible to add the Second Spanish Republic 1931-1939 as a country? Above all, when entering data from Republican planes participating in the Spanish Civil War or planes from the Republican period, it comes out with the wrong name and flag.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Spanish_Republic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Spanish_Republic
Wdrożone
All comments (9) » 1 7 February, 19:45
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Please can rename these two topics
SCM Topic: Auxiliary Repair Dock ARD-2-class
SCM Topic: Auxiliary Floating Dock, Big
As follows:
Auxiliary Repair Dock ARD-2-class
Auxiliary Floating Dock, Big
en.wikipedia.org/wik..ift%20larger%20ships.
I have also noted this topic which is categorised under infrastructure, transport
SCM Topic: Admiralty Floating Dock
en.wikipedia.org/wik..ralty_floating_docks
The top two topics are currently under motorships
Which is the correct categorisation
SCM Topic: Auxiliary Repair Dock ARD-2-class
SCM Topic: Auxiliary Floating Dock, Big
As follows:
Auxiliary Repair Dock ARD-2-class
Auxiliary Floating Dock, Big
en.wikipedia.org/wik..ift%20larger%20ships.
I have also noted this topic which is categorised under infrastructure, transport
SCM Topic: Admiralty Floating Dock
en.wikipedia.org/wik..ralty_floating_docks
The top two topics are currently under motorships
Which is the correct categorisation
Wdrożone
1 9 February, 12:54
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Please can we rename this topic
SCM Topic: Canon de 152 mm Modèle 1930
Canon de 152 mm Modèle 1930
en.wikipedia.org/wik.._mm_Mod%C3%A8le_1930
SCM Topic: Canon de 152 mm Modèle 1930
Canon de 152 mm Modèle 1930
en.wikipedia.org/wik.._mm_Mod%C3%A8le_1930
Wdrożone
1 March, 11:16
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Should
Micro Master - micromaster.co.nz/
and
MM@Shapeways shapeways.com/shops/micro-master
be treated as separate brands on Scalemates?
Each website has its own set of products with the micromaster.co.nz/ products at the high end of the market (or as as they term them the "Premium" end)
At the moment they are all listed together under SCM Brand: Micro Master
Micro Master - micromaster.co.nz/
and
MM@Shapeways shapeways.com/shops/micro-master
be treated as separate brands on Scalemates?
Each website has its own set of products with the micromaster.co.nz/ products at the high end of the market (or as as they term them the "Premium" end)
At the moment they are all listed together under SCM Brand: Micro Master
Wdrożone
8 March, 10:46
PIBWL@SCM Data suggestions
Please delete brand SCM Brand: No longer exists - I've made a double.
Edit: the second entry SCM Brand: No longer exists is redundant as well, because it is only a parent company of Military Scales brand SCM Brand: Military Scales
Edit: the second entry SCM Brand: No longer exists is redundant as well, because it is only a parent company of Military Scales brand SCM Brand: Military Scales
Wdrożone
1 9 March, 18:49
Mark@SCM Data suggestions
Is it possible to create a Topic for the Hasegawa Aircraft Weapons sets? For example, I have ONE box of Aircraft Weapons III (Hasegawa 35003-400, or X72-3), but when I added it to my Stash, it now shows I have SEVEN because each weapon is an individual entry.
Wdrożone
16 April, 20:28
scalemates
this is by design and should stay like this
that said 🙂 ... if you go to your profile and preferences there is the option "Hide double multitopic items in stash". This will only show it once
this is by design and should stay like this
that said 🙂 ... if you go to your profile and preferences there is the option "Hide double multitopic items in stash". This will only show it once
21 April, 07:00
Mark@SCM Data suggestions
The entry "SM-65 Atlas" under the Topic category should be, "Convair SM-65 Atlas" to indicate the manufacturer.
Wdrożone
1 16 April, 19:30
April 20, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Zero-sen 52 & Hayabusa 2 (Mitsuwa Model 1, 1:144)
Zero-sen 52 | Hayabusa 2 (Mitsuwa Model 1, 1:144)
Zero-sen 52 & Hayabusa 2 (Mitsuwa Model 1, 1:144)
Zero-sen 52 | Hayabusa 2 (Mitsuwa Model 1, 1:144)
Wdrożone
1 19 April, 21:15
April 19, 2024
Alexey Antipin@SCM Data suggestions
SCM Topic: Tupolev SB
It is not "SB-2", it is just "SB". "2" in the designation of a particular modifications meant "two engines", e.g. "SB-2M103" would mean "SB with two M103 engines"
It is not "SB-2", it is just "SB". "2" in the designation of a particular modifications meant "two engines", e.g. "SB-2M103" would mean "SB with two M103 engines"
Wdrożone
19 April, 12:40
April 18, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Canopy - Ki-27 Nate (Squadron 9130, 1:72)
Nakajima Ki-27 Canopy Set (Squadron 9130, 1:72)
Canopy - Ki-27 Nate (Squadron 9130, 1:72)
Nakajima Ki-27 Canopy Set (Squadron 9130, 1:72)
Wdrożone
17 April, 21:27
April 17, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Nakajima Ki-27A & B "Nate" C..canopy (Squadron 9601, 1:48)
Nakajima Ki-27a & b 'Nate' C..nopies (Squadron 9601, 1:48)
Nakajima Ki-27A & B "Nate" C..canopy (Squadron 9601, 1:48)
Nakajima Ki-27a & b 'Nate' C..nopies (Squadron 9601, 1:48)
Wdrożone
1 16 April, 19:49
April 16, 2024
Mark@SCM Data suggestions
The correct topic for any Boeing -135 series aircraft (KC, EC, RC, etc.) should be "Boeing 717." The KC-135 family was a separate build from the Boeing 707, Note that Boeing re-used the 717 model number when they obtained McDonnell Douglas, and upgraded the MD-80 series aircraft. That may cause a bit of confusion.
16 April, 21:56
April 14, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
J1N1-S Gekko (Irving) & Ki-21-II (Sally) (IMAI 2, 1:144)
Nakajima J1N1-S Gekko (Irvin..mber (Sally) (IMAI 2, 1:144)
J1N1-S Gekko (Irving) & Ki-21-II (Sally) (IMAI 2, 1:144)
Nakajima J1N1-S Gekko (Irvin..mber (Sally) (IMAI 2, 1:144)
Wdrożone
13 April, 20:37
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Nakajima J1N1 R Type 2 & Mit..iryu (Peggy) (IMAI 3, 1:144)
Nakajima J1N1 R Type 2 & Mit..iryu (Peggy) (IMAI 3, 1:144)
Nakajima J1N1 R Type 2 & Mit..iryu (Peggy) (IMAI 3, 1:144)
Nakajima J1N1 R Type 2 & Mit..iryu (Peggy) (IMAI 3, 1:144)
Wdrożone
13 April, 20:36
April 13, 2024
CartoonX@SCM Data suggestions
Broken timelines:
MiG-23ML Flogger (Italeri 057, 1:72)
Mig-23 (Zvezda 7218, 1:72)
MiG-23ML Flogger G (Bilek 801, 1:72)
MiG-23ML Flogger (Italeri 057, 1:72)
Mig-23 (Zvezda 7218, 1:72)
MiG-23ML Flogger G (Bilek 801, 1:72)
13 April, 13:31
April 12, 2024
April 11, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Canopy - Nakajima C6N1 Saiun Myrt (Squadron 9639, 1:48)
Nakajima C6N1 Myrt Canopy (Squadron 9639, 1:48)
Canopy - Nakajima C6N1 Saiun Myrt (Squadron 9639, 1:48)
Nakajima C6N1 Myrt Canopy (Squadron 9639, 1:48)
Wdrożone
10 April, 20:36
Ihor C@SCM Data suggestions
Delete the empty topic SCM Topic: No longer exists (written with dash)
There is a correct topic SCM Topic: KamAZ 6350
There is a correct topic SCM Topic: KamAZ 6350
Wdrożone
1 11 April, 06:37
April 10, 2024
Ihor C@SCM Data suggestions
Please remove following kits. They are announces and real kits already added to the database:
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35A "Lightning II" - Cockp..ame (ResKit RS48-XXYZ, 1:48)
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:72)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35 "Lightning II" female pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot 2 (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35A "Lightning II" - Cockp..ame (ResKit RS48-XXYZ, 1:48)
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:72)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35 "Lightning II" female pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot 2 (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
F-35 "Lightning II" male pilot (ResKit TBA, 1:48)
Wdrożone
1 10 April, 16:48
Eddie Mann
Done except for:
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:72)
Only 1:48 version in database
Done except for:
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
F-35A "Lightning II" Pilot sitting (ResKit TBA, 1:72)
Only 1:48 version in database
10 April, 17:50
April 9, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
B5N2 Kate Canopy Set (Squadron 9155, 1:72)
Nakajima B5N2 Kate (Squadron 9155, 1:72)
B5N2 Kate Canopy Set (Squadron 9155, 1:72)
Nakajima B5N2 Kate (Squadron 9155, 1:72)
Wdrożone
1 7 April, 19:12
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Nakajima B6N2 'Jill' Crystal..nopies (Squadron 9602, 1:48)
Nakajima B6N2 'Jill' Crystal..nopies (Squadron 9602, 1:48)
Nakajima B6N2 'Jill' Crystal..nopies (Squadron 9602, 1:48)
Nakajima B6N2 'Jill' Crystal..nopies (Squadron 9602, 1:48)
Wdrożone
1 8 April, 20:15
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Kawanishi N1K2-J George (LS 01028, 1:144)
Nakajima B6N2 Mk.21 Jill (LS 01028, 1:144)
Kawanishi N1K2-J George (LS 01028, 1:144)
Nakajima B6N2 Mk.21 Jill (LS 01028, 1:144)
Wdrożone
1 8 April, 19:43
April 8, 2024
April 7, 2024
Matt L@SCM Data suggestions
Cannot find Revell Aqua Color 36189 Beige 5 ml - please add this one or correct one that is wrong
5 April, 15:02
April 5, 2024
Stas Savchenko@SCM Data suggestions
M37 walkaround:
hemmings.com/auction..odge-m37-277638/sold
hemmings.com/auction..odge-m37-277638/sold
5 April, 14:41
April 3, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two. One is already marked as a duplicate.
Bf 110C (Eduard 8201x, 1:48)
Bf 110C (Eduard 8201X, 1:48)
Bf 110C (Eduard 8201x, 1:48)
Bf 110C (Eduard 8201X, 1:48)
Wdrożone
2 April, 21:24
April 1, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two records:
Mitsubishi Ki-67 'Hiryu' (Peggy) (Aoshima 032152, 1:144)
Mitsubishi Ki-67 Hiryu Bomber (Aoshima 32152, 1:144)
Product number 32152 is already listed as an alternate number in the 032152 record.
Mitsubishi Ki-67 'Hiryu' (Peggy) (Aoshima 032152, 1:144)
Mitsubishi Ki-67 Hiryu Bomber (Aoshima 32152, 1:144)
Product number 32152 is already listed as an alternate number in the 032152 record.
Wdrożone
31 March, 20:19
March 31, 2024
Mike Blackwell@SCM Data suggestions
I just picked up a copy of this kit:
gundammates.com/kits..edom-gundam--1303025
...with the Bandai Namco logo at top right and a product code of 5065620. I see the brand Bandai Namco is listed as "do not use," and I'm curious what that means.
gundammates.com/kits..edom-gundam--1303025
...with the Bandai Namco logo at top right and a product code of 5065620. I see the brand Bandai Namco is listed as "do not use," and I'm curious what that means.
31 March, 21:45
March 29, 2024
Ihor C@SCM Data suggestions
Merge the topic SCM Topic: No longer exists into SCM Topic: Scaled Composites Proteus
Wdrożone
1 27 March, 21:29
March 27, 2024
Rui@SCM Data suggestions
Not sure what to do about this...
The current scalemates listing for Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Radome Tan FS33798 is the following:
71.074 Radome Tan - FS23594, Vallejo Model Air Matt, Acrylic, 17ml
The above is supported by this Vallejo Model Air Color Range chart, which I assume is an older publication:
[img1]
However, the current chart on Vallejo's site indicates the product to be Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Beige FS33695
acrylicosvallejo.com..l_Air-Rev20-baja.pdf
The later aligns with the bottle of Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Beige FS33695 which I bought today.
Should I go ahead and change the original entry? It may become an issue for people whole may have product with the earlier name. However, adding a new entry into the database would create two products with the same product number but different names.
Not sure what to do.
The current scalemates listing for Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Radome Tan FS33798 is the following:
71.074 Radome Tan - FS23594, Vallejo Model Air Matt, Acrylic, 17ml
The above is supported by this Vallejo Model Air Color Range chart, which I assume is an older publication:
[img1]
However, the current chart on Vallejo's site indicates the product to be Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Beige FS33695
acrylicosvallejo.com..l_Air-Rev20-baja.pdf
The later aligns with the bottle of Vallejo Model Air 71.074 Beige FS33695 which I bought today.
Should I go ahead and change the original entry? It may become an issue for people whole may have product with the earlier name. However, adding a new entry into the database would create two products with the same product number but different names.
Not sure what to do.
Rozpoczęte
1 23 March, 02:06
March 24, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Reppu & Raiden (Micro Ace 42053, 1:144)
Reppu & Raiden (Micro Ace 42053, 1:144)
Reppu & Raiden (Micro Ace 42053, 1:144)
Reppu & Raiden (Micro Ace 42053, 1:144)
Wdrożone
22 March, 19:59
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Mitsubishi J2M3 Mk.21 Jack (LS 01027, 1:144)
Mitsubishi A7M2 Sam (LS 01027, 1:144)
Mitsubishi J2M3 Mk.21 Jack (LS 01027, 1:144)
Mitsubishi A7M2 Sam (LS 01027, 1:144)
Wdrożone
22 March, 20:09
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Raiden & Zero-sen 52 (Mitsuwa Model 3, 1:144)
Raiden & Zero-sen 52 (Mitsuwa Model 3, 1:144)
Raiden & Zero-sen 52 (Mitsuwa Model 3, 1:144)
Raiden & Zero-sen 52 (Mitsuwa Model 3, 1:144)
Wdrożone
22 March, 20:12
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
Mitsubishi J2M3 Raiden Type 21 (Maketar MM32102V, 1:32)
Mitsubishi J2M3 Raiden Type 21 (Maketar MM32102V, 1:32)
Mitsubishi J2M3 Raiden Type 21 (Maketar MM32102V, 1:32)
Mitsubishi J2M3 Raiden Type 21 (Maketar MM32102V, 1:32)
Wdrożone
22 March, 20:43
March 22, 2024
Matt L@SCM Data suggestions
Please add the hobby lamp (Utility):
Light4Vision Powerful Slim Flex XL (LV3133-W)
Light4Vision Powerful Slim Flex XL (LV3133-W)
Wdrożone
22 March, 10:19
Matt L
Powerful Slim Flex XL (Unknown LV3133-W, )
Cannot add brand: Light4Vision
Please help.
Powerful Slim Flex XL (Unknown LV3133-W, )
Cannot add brand: Light4Vision
Please help.
22 March, 15:38
Botan T@SCM Data suggestions
I messed up. I added some decals, but in shop (Hannants and mojehobby) they had wrong name of company and so I made doubles.. Those are doubles: SPAD S.VII (KV Models KVD72003, 1:72) and Spad S.VII (KV Models KVD72004, 1:72) ; those are correct ones: SPAD VII (Klastr Decol KD72003, 1:72) oraz SPAD VII (Klastr Decol KD72004, 1:72)
Wdrożone
1 21 March, 21:06
March 19, 2024
Chester S. A. Reginald Berwick, Duke of ...@SCM Data suggestions
I have a question regarding boxarts. There is following warning for boxart picture upload:
----
IMPORTANT: DO NOT UPLOAD boxart pictures which (partially) contain a real photo of the original!!!
Even when they come from the brand website
----
I was wondering why is it that way. I can understand copyright issues with some newer photos. So do the manufacturers apparently, because they do not use unlicensed photos. Now what if the "boxart" with real photo comes directly from manufacturers' catalogue, with some corporate graphic and subject description added? The real photo is of some WWII subject or older and is in public domain. Such uploaded boxarts are still being removed.
Why is it that way?
----
IMPORTANT: DO NOT UPLOAD boxart pictures which (partially) contain a real photo of the original!!!
Even when they come from the brand website
----
I was wondering why is it that way. I can understand copyright issues with some newer photos. So do the manufacturers apparently, because they do not use unlicensed photos. Now what if the "boxart" with real photo comes directly from manufacturers' catalogue, with some corporate graphic and subject description added? The real photo is of some WWII subject or older and is in public domain. Such uploaded boxarts are still being removed.
Why is it that way?
Wdrożone
All comments (6) » 1 21 February, 02:49
Chester S. A. Reginald Berwick, Duke of ...
Now I believe this boxart should be removed:
UH-60A Black Hawk (ICM TBA35-2024A, 1:35)
And also this one. Not that I expect some copyright issues to be there, just for the sake of consistency:
Army Kitchen Truck (ICM 35587, 1:35)
Now I believe this boxart should be removed:
UH-60A Black Hawk (ICM TBA35-2024A, 1:35)
And also this one. Not that I expect some copyright issues to be there, just for the sake of consistency:
Army Kitchen Truck (ICM 35587, 1:35)
19 March, 16:22
March 18, 2024
Steven Van Dyck@SCM Data suggestions
Some MK1 products got a double under the brand KA Models, which seems to be rather a webshop selling multiple brands. The box only shows the MK1 logo.
USS New York (LPD-21) Detail.. (KA Models MD-35039, 1:350)
LPD-21 New York - Detail Up Set (MK1 Design MS-35039, 1:350)
Trumpeter CV-64 Constellation mit MK-1 Zurüstsatz | Project by modellbauthomas (1:350)
USS New York (LPD-21) Detail.. (KA Models MD-35039, 1:350)
LPD-21 New York - Detail Up Set (MK1 Design MS-35039, 1:350)
Trumpeter CV-64 Constellation mit MK-1 Zurüstsatz | Project by modellbauthomas (1:350)
18 March, 12:19
Eddie Mann@SCM Data suggestions
When classifying new topics they seem to save OK but revert back.
SCM Topic: Fiat 40 Boghetto
SCM Topic: Fiat 40 Boghetto
SCM Topic: Fiat SPA 37
SCM Topic: Fiat SPA 37
SCM Topic: Fiat 40 Boghetto
SCM Topic: Fiat 40 Boghetto
SCM Topic: Fiat SPA 37
SCM Topic: Fiat SPA 37
Rozpoczęte
17 March, 19:08
March 17, 2024
Axel Wolters@SCM Data suggestions
Dubena Cesky Dub No. 3228 Esso Tanker originally was C.F. Riegel Esso Tanker from the early 1960s. Dubena even uses the same box art, with slightly different colours. So the description "New tool 1975" at Dubena 3228 kit should be updated to "Reissue"
Wdrożone
15 March, 17:39
Alec K
Thanks for that correction Axel. I have updated as suggested. Let me know if you have exact release date and I'll update it.
Thanks for that correction Axel. I have updated as suggested. Let me know if you have exact release date and I'll update it.
17 March, 22:37
March 16, 2024
Steven Van Dyck@SCM Data suggestions
This evening I will post pictures of Flanders Modelling Festival, but a new event page for the 2024 edition is not created. It's just the same page with another date added. Therefore I won't be able to separate the pictures I will make from the ones I made in 2023, because the album needs to have the exact name of the event page, and that wasn't copied to a new edition. I might be able to make another album with the same name (didn't try that before), but you won't be able to tell which album is for which edition.
Flanders' Modelling Festival (16. March, Hoboken (Antwerpen) BE)
Flanders' Modelling Festival (16. March, Hoboken (Antwerpen) BE)
15 March, 23:52
Steven Van Dyck
Because there was no alternative, I changed the name of the earlier album to "Flanders' Modelling Festival 2023" and made a new album "Flanders' Modelling Festival". I still hope some arrangement can be made that the first album remains on the page with the correct edition year shown near the new album.
Because there was no alternative, I changed the name of the earlier album to "Flanders' Modelling Festival 2023" and made a new album "Flanders' Modelling Festival". I still hope some arrangement can be made that the first album remains on the page with the correct edition year shown near the new album.
16 March, 20:08
March 15, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
These items don't seem to exist in the real world. The product numbers are all prefixed with TBA (to be announced) followed by a year (2022). I've searched the Eduard website and there is nothing there to indicate these are real kits. The kits listed on their site for A6M2, A6M3, A6M5, A6M7 are already in the database.
Mitsubishi A6M2 Type 21 "Ove..es" (Eduard TBA202204, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M3 Zero Model 22a (Eduard TBA2022Z3, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52a (Eduard TBA2022Z6, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52b (Eduard TBA2022Z7, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52 (Eduard TBA2022Z5, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M7 Zero Model 63 (Eduard TBA2022Z9, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52c (Eduard TBA2022Z8, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M2-K Zero Trainer (Eduard TBA2022xx, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M2 Type 21 "Ove..es" (Eduard TBA202204, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M3 Zero Model 22a (Eduard TBA2022Z3, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52a (Eduard TBA2022Z6, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52b (Eduard TBA2022Z7, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52 (Eduard TBA2022Z5, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M7 Zero Model 63 (Eduard TBA2022Z9, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52c (Eduard TBA2022Z8, 1:48)
Mitsubishi A6M2-K Zero Trainer (Eduard TBA2022xx, 1:48)
Wdrożone
14 March, 20:15
March 14, 2024
Bart Goesaert@SCM Data suggestions
Why is the cross to close the filter page suddenly almost invisible?
Wdrożone
22 December 2023, 19:55
Bart Goesaert
jus a quick question. Since recently, when posting pictures I can only see part of the picture, while before the picture was made to fit the window. I don't know when you see the same when looking at others albums? It is like this in the tumbnails, but also on my wall.
jus a quick question. Since recently, when posting pictures I can only see part of the picture, while before the picture was made to fit the window. I don't know when you see the same when looking at others albums? It is like this in the tumbnails, but also on my wall.
14 March, 07:31
March 13, 2024
Tim Rathbone » Żądania funkcji
The Atlantis jenny is the Aurora mold not the Lindberg mold
The Atlantis jenny is the Aurora mold not the Lindberg mold
13 March, 07:37
March 12, 2024
scalemates@SCM Data suggestions
SCM Brand: Dumas contains plenty of items for rcmates.net (not all, but plenty)
Rozpoczęte
12 March, 18:48
Mike Pullen@SCM Data suggestions
Can these be moved to rcmates please:
SCM Brand: JC Racing Products
SCM Brand: Kamtec Modelsport
SCM Brand: LandL Models
SCM Brand: Carson Modelsport
SCM Brand: Pro Star Accessories
SCM Brand: Pro-Line Racing
And basically all the Tamiya 1:10 scale stuff is RC
SCM Search:
Along with all their 1:14 scale stuff too
SCM Search:
SCM Brand: JC Racing Products
SCM Brand: Kamtec Modelsport
SCM Brand: LandL Models
SCM Brand: Carson Modelsport
SCM Brand: Pro Star Accessories
SCM Brand: Pro-Line Racing
And basically all the Tamiya 1:10 scale stuff is RC
SCM Search:
Along with all their 1:14 scale stuff too
SCM Search:
Wdrożone
All comments (7) » 3 10 March, 20:49
scalemates
This is a though one.....
All 3 examples of ships = 100% RC, not scalemates (primary goal is RC, details are rudimentary, no aftermarket sets exist, brands mostly not known by plastic modellers.)
The 1:16 RC Tigers = of course RC, but also scalemates as many pure scale modeling aftermarket sets exists
Panzerkampfwagen VI "Tiger I..) AusfB (Tamiya 56004, 1:16)
If in doubt mark them for both and post them on in Data Suggestions so we can discuss....
This is a though one.....
All 3 examples of ships = 100% RC, not scalemates (primary goal is RC, details are rudimentary, no aftermarket sets exist, brands mostly not known by plastic modellers.)
The 1:16 RC Tigers = of course RC, but also scalemates as many pure scale modeling aftermarket sets exists
Panzerkampfwagen VI "Tiger I..) AusfB (Tamiya 56004, 1:16)
If in doubt mark them for both and post them on in Data Suggestions so we can discuss....
12 March, 17:58
Ihor C@SCM Data suggestions
Please remove this item: MJ1 Loader (ResKit TBA, 1:32)
This was the announce. All versions of this vehicle an all scales are already released and present in the database.
This was the announce. All versions of this vehicle an all scales are already released and present in the database.
Wdrożone
1 12 March, 11:17
Rainer Tunkowitsch@SCM Data suggestions
Hi! Yesterday, someone listed two Peels and two Toyotas 1/24 as manufacturer "Unknown". The manufacturer is Zoomon Model and at least the Peels (Peel Trident 1965 #Z137 and Peel 50 1962 #Z130) are already listed.
12 March, 06:29
March 11, 2024
Starbase101@SCM Data suggestions
I don't know what topic this should be in, so I assigned it to SCM Topic: Yardarm, Ratline, Rigging, Jackstay when adding the product. Please move to the correct topic if needed. Parral Set - Set of Two Ribs..al (HiSModel SET-Z008, 1:72)
Wdrożone
2 11 March, 18:56
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Re the implemented discussion below (and moving Tamiya RC kits) should this topic be considered also?
SCM Topic: Educational Construction
SCM Topic: Educational Construction
Wdrożone
1 11 March, 13:36
March 10, 2024
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Train set?
TWINDEXX Vario Double Deck r..G, 3pcs (Brawa 64500, 1:160)
multiple kits added under new topic SCM Topic: TWINDEXX Vario
TWINDEXX Vario Double Deck r..G, 3pcs (Brawa 64500, 1:160)
multiple kits added under new topic SCM Topic: TWINDEXX Vario
Wdrożone
10 March, 12:08
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Toys ?
Multiple kits added under new topic
SCM Topic: Ferris wheels
Ferris wheel complete set (Faller 191710, 1:87)
Multiple kits added under new topic
SCM Topic: Ferris wheels
Ferris wheel complete set (Faller 191710, 1:87)
Wdrożone
1 10 March, 12:11
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Wdrożone
All comments (7) » 1 10 March, 12:40
scalemates
rcmates.net was added yesterday and railwaymates.com has been reactivated today
rcmates (RCM) contains 4000 items (most of them moved over from SCM)
railwaymates (RWM) contains 50000 items (many items are visible on both. eg. 1:87 kit of a tank = fits both sites. Please note it is the same entry in the database. WHile even more only on RWM)
Powercontributors can see an additional section 'Scope'; which allows to see where items are displayed.
rcmates.net was added yesterday and railwaymates.com has been reactivated today
rcmates (RCM) contains 4000 items (most of them moved over from SCM)
railwaymates (RWM) contains 50000 items (many items are visible on both. eg. 1:87 kit of a tank = fits both sites. Please note it is the same entry in the database. WHile even more only on RWM)
Powercontributors can see an additional section 'Scope'; which allows to see where items are displayed.
10 March, 15:12
Eddie Mann@SCM Data suggestions
Why are there so many items under SCM Brand: Bandai Spirits
when the boxart shows Bandai?
when the boxart shows Bandai?
10 March, 08:48
Brad Jensen@SCM Data suggestions
Thoughts on adding SpinMaster cardstock models? I was looking to add the Star Wars Imperial Star Destroyer to my stash and noticed that we don't have any of that brand in the site. Since the Metal Earth kits are on the site, the site doesn't seem to be limited to just plastic models.
Rozpoczęte
10 March, 04:55
March 9, 2024
Mike Blackwell@SCM Data suggestions
The MGM-13 is a later designation of the TM-76. Should these two topics be merged, so the Renwal kits can be linked to the Revell "History Makers" reboxing?
Martin MACE TM-76 -- SCM Topic: No longer exists
MGM-13 Mace -- SCM Topic: MGM-13 Mace
Martin MACE TM-76 -- SCM Topic: No longer exists
MGM-13 Mace -- SCM Topic: MGM-13 Mace
Wdrożone
3 9 March, 16:54
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Not sure if this will fix itself soon or just at my end but I just entered this kit
14" (35.6cm) MKVII (Micro Master MM1754P, 1:128)
However if you search for MM1754P it cannot be located and doesnt show up in Updates
14" (35.6cm) MKVII (Micro Master MM1754P, 1:128)
However if you search for MM1754P it cannot be located and doesnt show up in Updates
Rozpoczęte
9 March, 09:46
scalemates
should be fixed.... ping me if on the next change it happens again. I gave power contributors more rights but I might have missed something
should be fixed.... ping me if on the next change it happens again. I gave power contributors more rights but I might have missed something
9 March, 10:10
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Wdrożone
All comments (5) » 2 19 February, 04:57
Richmond
Thanks for clarification, it does make sense to allow some RC kits based on your explanation.
May have to look in on diecast mates for nostalgia purposes.
Thanks for clarification, it does make sense to allow some RC kits based on your explanation.
May have to look in on diecast mates for nostalgia purposes.
20 February, 00:07
scalemates
Please check www.rcmates.net
RC items on either scalemates or diecastmates should be visible only on rcmates.net
For an RC model which is based on a real kit (eg. the 5 rebox now including an RC engine) can be linked to both
Please check www.rcmates.net
RC items on either scalemates or diecastmates should be visible only on rcmates.net
For an RC model which is based on a real kit (eg. the 5 rebox now including an RC engine) can be linked to both
9 March, 09:28
March 8, 2024
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Please can we amend this subject line
20 mm/70 Mk.4 (single mount)
to
20 mm/70 (Mk.4 single mount)
It will not let me change it and keeps reverting to the incorrect version.
20 mm/70 Mk.4 (single mount)
to
20 mm/70 (Mk.4 single mount)
It will not let me change it and keeps reverting to the incorrect version.
1 7 March, 15:25
March 7, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two records:
A6M Zero Crystal Canopy Set (Squadron 9555, 1:48)
A6M Crystal Clear Canopy (Squadron Products 9555, 1:48)
A6M Zero Crystal Canopy Set (Squadron 9555, 1:48)
A6M Crystal Clear Canopy (Squadron Products 9555, 1:48)
Wdrożone
6 March, 22:27
Marc Bastide@SCM Data suggestions
good afternoon
For quite a time now , the stashexporter.php gives me a blank page... Too many models perhaps? the other completed, started and whished work normally.
Thanks.
For quite a time now , the stashexporter.php gives me a blank page... Too many models perhaps? the other completed, started and whished work normally.
Thanks.
7 March, 17:00
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Please can we rename this topic
SCM Topic: Deep submergence vehicle Priz-class
Deep submergence vehicle Priz-class
en.wikipedia.org/wik..gence_rescue_vehicle
SCM Topic: Deep submergence vehicle Priz-class
Deep submergence vehicle Priz-class
en.wikipedia.org/wik..gence_rescue_vehicle
Wdrożone
1 22 January, 04:01
March 6, 2024
Juan M Leria@SCM Data suggestions
How do you add information of a color chip?
FS11310, to be more precise
FS11310, to be more precise
Rozpoczęte
1 6 March, 10:24
scalemates
I already added scalemates.com/colors/colorchip.php?id=3494
I still need to run some extra actions for the snippet to popup FS11310
I already added scalemates.com/colors/colorchip.php?id=3494
I still need to run some extra actions for the snippet to popup FS11310
6 March, 15:35
Juan M Leria
CMYK: 0; 62; 64; 29
sRGB: 180; 68; 65
Hex: #B44441
e-paint.co.uk/colour..tion=Post+Office+red
CMYK: 0; 62; 64; 29
sRGB: 180; 68; 65
Hex: #B44441
e-paint.co.uk/colour..tion=Post+Office+red
6 March, 21:04
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Anyone have a view about merging these topics or should they stay apart?
SCM Topic: Escort carrier Bogue-class
SCM Topic: No longer exists
en.wikipedia.org/wik..class_escort_carrier
en.wikipedia.org/wik..class_escort_carrier
Irresective the "attacker" should be renamed Escort carrier Attacker-class
SCM Topic: Escort carrier Bogue-class
SCM Topic: No longer exists
en.wikipedia.org/wik..class_escort_carrier
en.wikipedia.org/wik..class_escort_carrier
Irresective the "attacker" should be renamed Escort carrier Attacker-class
Wdrożone
1 20 January, 11:14
scalemates
renamed Escort carrier Attacker-class, but no opinion if they should be merged
renamed Escort carrier Attacker-class, but no opinion if they should be merged
26 January, 19:40
Eddie Mann
I would say merge them as "11 transferring to the Royal Navy, where they were renamed and grouped as the Attacker class"
I would say merge them as "11 transferring to the Royal Navy, where they were renamed and grouped as the Attacker class"
26 January, 21:37
Eddie Mann@SCM Data suggestions
Does anyone have any idea why "decals good" has been added to 240+ product numbers?
SCM Search: decals good
SCM Search: decals good
Wdrożone
1 5 March, 16:24
scalemates
fixed! It was a user thinking he was changing his personal stash info. All clear now and bulk fixed
fixed! It was a user thinking he was changing his personal stash info. All clear now and bulk fixed
6 March, 09:48
March 5, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend deleting this record:
A6M2 Zero S.A. (Eduard Il2m3S.A., 1:72)
The Eduard website indicates the correct product number is 73426 which is already in the database.
A6M2 Zero S.A. (Eduard Il2m3S.A., 1:72)
The Eduard website indicates the correct product number is 73426 which is already in the database.
Wdrożone
1 5 March, 22:04
Lego@SCM Data suggestions
Can you add A.MIG-2322 black Chrome to the A-Stand paint range please.
migjimenez.com/en/am..e-8432074023227.html
migjimenez.com/en/am..e-8432074023227.html
Wdrożone
2 4 March, 19:20
Tomas Enerdal@SCM Data suggestions
The new Laminar Flow Design for the 1/32 Spitfire Mk.XII is suggested for the three Tamiya 1/32 Spitfires. It's not really meant for the low-back Mk.XVI, the Mk.XII only had the earlier canopy.
Wdrożone
2 5 March, 07:04
Eddie Mann
Changed to Mk VIII/IX as shown on box. This issue and similar are caused by certain people choosing the easy option "Product Family" instead of "Specific Kits".
Changed to Mk VIII/IX as shown on box. This issue and similar are caused by certain people choosing the easy option "Product Family" instead of "Specific Kits".
5 March, 11:59
March 3, 2024
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
This is an old topic not sure why it is appearing in new topics
SCM Topic: Destroyer G-class
Ditto
SCM Topic: 5.2 cm SK L/55 naval gun
Ditto
SCM Topic: Carley float
Ditto
SCM Topic: Boats
PS is it because something has changed in the topic? I know I edited some of these?
SCM Topic: Destroyer G-class
Ditto
SCM Topic: 5.2 cm SK L/55 naval gun
Ditto
SCM Topic: Carley float
Ditto
SCM Topic: Boats
PS is it because something has changed in the topic? I know I edited some of these?
Wdrożone
1 2 March, 09:38
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
I doint belive these should be linked, look at the bows
Smit Houston (Revell 05239, 1:200)
SMIT Frankrijk (Revell 05209, 1:200)
Smit Houston (Revell 05239, 1:200)
SMIT Frankrijk (Revell 05209, 1:200)
Wdrożone
3 3 March, 05:37
Eddie Mann
One is 66 metres long, the other is 28. Ive unlinked them and moved 05209 to SCM Topic: Harbour tugboat
One is 66 metres long, the other is 28. Ive unlinked them and moved 05209 to SCM Topic: Harbour tugboat
3 March, 08:35
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Please can we rename this topic
SCM Topic: Navigational research test vessel USS Compass Island (EAG-153)
Navigational research test vessel USS Compass Island (EAG-153)
SCM Topic: Navigational research test vessel USS Compass Island (EAG-153)
Navigational research test vessel USS Compass Island (EAG-153)
Wdrożone
1 3 March, 01:33
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
All these topics are empty but still showing up as uncategorised
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
SCM Topic: No longer exists
2 2 March, 04:44
scalemates
I fixed it in between 2 other acitivities... but forgot to mark it as resolved
I fixed it in between 2 other acitivities... but forgot to mark it as resolved
3 March, 08:38
March 2, 2024
Tim Jacobs@SCM Data suggestions
Recommend merging these two:
A6M Zero Canopy Set (Squadron 9124, 1:72)
Mitsubishi A6M Zero (Squadron 9124, 1:72)
A6M Zero Canopy Set (Squadron 9124, 1:72)
Mitsubishi A6M Zero (Squadron 9124, 1:72)
Wdrożone
1 March, 22:44
March 1, 2024
Stuart T@SCM Data suggestions
Is this the correct place to request a product add? If so, could you please add the following?
scalemodeller.com.au..=00ffec716&_ss=r
scalemodeller.com.au..=00ffec716&_ss=r
scalemodeller.com.au..=00ffec716&_ss=r
scalemodeller.com.au..=00ffec716&_ss=r
Wdrożone
1 1 March, 02:43
February 28, 2024
Trez Mackenzie@SCM Data suggestions
Mud Pigments & Color Set
Life Color
Colours and pigments not on data
Life Color
Colours and pigments not on data
Wdrożone
1 28 February, 18:21
Oleg Schtofenmaher@SCM Data suggestions
I'm trying to fix the timeline for this line of kits, but can't figure out what is wrong:
Cessna C-180 (Kovozávody Prostějov KPM0236, 1:72)
Cessna C-180 (Kovozávody Prostějov KPM0236, 1:72)
Wdrożone
28 February, 12:39
Vince Jackson@SCM Data suggestions
Duplicate listings on these two kits.
US C-RAM with HEMTT A3 (I Love Kit 63526, 1:35)
C-RAM with HEMTT A3 (I Love Kit 63526, 1:35)
I suggest keeping the second listing as it contains the correct instructions.
US C-RAM with HEMTT A3 (I Love Kit 63526, 1:35)
C-RAM with HEMTT A3 (I Love Kit 63526, 1:35)
I suggest keeping the second listing as it contains the correct instructions.
Wdrożone
1 27 February, 15:34
Vicente Sánchez Navarro@SCM Data suggestions
Would it be possible to add in paints, the WW2 Soviet aviation color palette like AMT colors, etc... and also Regia Aeronautica colors like Giallo Mimetico 1,2... Verde Mimetico, etc?
It would be the same thing to do when you write the color scheme in the kit edition and put the number of a federal standard color or a British standard color.
VVS (Currently this month of February this website is not working due to a technical problem) massimotessitori.alt..ors/color-table.html
Regia Aeronautica stormomagazine.com/R..aColorsinWWII_3a.htm
It would be the same thing to do when you write the color scheme in the kit edition and put the number of a federal standard color or a British standard color.
VVS (Currently this month of February this website is not working due to a technical problem) massimotessitori.alt..ors/color-table.html
Regia Aeronautica stormomagazine.com/R..aColorsinWWII_3a.htm
28 February, 11:45
February 27, 2024
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Can we delete this there is no image no one has in stash and the product seems to be a poster
ANYZ MODELS F4U-1D Poster 84..1.7 inch) (ANYZ AN092, 1:32)
ANYZ MODELS F4U-1D Poster 84..1.7 inch) (ANYZ AN092, 1:32)
Wdrożone
2 27 February, 14:28
berni@SCM Data suggestions
All three kits are the same:
Bf 109 G-10 (Revell 03958, 1:48)
please delete: Messerschmitt Bf109 G-10 (Revell 03958, 1:48) (data incomplete)
please delete: Bf109 G-10 (Revell Brazil 03958, 1:48) (this kit has no timeline)
Bf 109 G-10 (Revell 03958, 1:48)
please delete: Messerschmitt Bf109 G-10 (Revell 03958, 1:48) (data incomplete)
please delete: Bf109 G-10 (Revell Brazil 03958, 1:48) (this kit has no timeline)
Wdrożone
26 February, 17:30
February 26, 2024
Ihor C@SCM Data suggestions
Please remove this MikroMir's kit: Sikorsky H-19 (MikroMir TBA, 1:48)
Because this is an AMP's kit: Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw/Whirlwind (AMP 48022, 1:48)
Because this is an AMP's kit: Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw/Whirlwind (AMP 48022, 1:48)
Wdrożone
26 February, 16:55
February 25, 2024
Fernando Castro@SCM Data suggestions
Instructions currently uploaded for Monogram Grumman F9F Panther 1:48 #5456 at this location:
/products/img/4/8/3/192483-51-instructions.pdf
Are actually for Hasegawa Grumman F9F-2 Panther 1:72 Kit # 618
Recommend removal of erroneous instructions.
/products/img/4/8/3/192483-51-instructions.pdf
Are actually for Hasegawa Grumman F9F-2 Panther 1:72 Kit # 618
Recommend removal of erroneous instructions.
25 February, 04:11
Richmond@SCM Data suggestions
Re UK Destroyer Topics and using the following as an example
SCM Topic: Destroyer U-class
This has as an ALT1 -V-class (1943)
However I have just tried to enter kit which was for the V-class destroyer (1943)
When I typed V-class it did not give me the option of selecting the above topic taking me to this as an option which is the WWI version
SCM Topic: Destroyer V-class (1917)
(this has a ALT W-class)
My first thought is we should amend all UK Destroyer topic names and remove the Alt
So in this example the top topic should be renamed
Destroyer U and V-class
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U_and_V-class_destroyer
and the bottom topic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_and_W-class_destroyer
Destroyer V and W-class
However would this solve the issue ?
Another option although probably not historically correct is to give each their own topic?
Would appreciate comment from other Scalemates.
SCM Topic: Destroyer U-class
This has as an ALT1 -V-class (1943)
However I have just tried to enter kit which was for the V-class destroyer (1943)
When I typed V-class it did not give me the option of selecting the above topic taking me to this as an option which is the WWI version
SCM Topic: Destroyer V-class (1917)
(this has a ALT W-class)
My first thought is we should amend all UK Destroyer topic names and remove the Alt
So in this example the top topic should be renamed
Destroyer U and V-class
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U_and_V-class_destroyer
and the bottom topic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_and_W-class_destroyer
Destroyer V and W-class
However would this solve the issue ?
Another option although probably not historically correct is to give each their own topic?
Would appreciate comment from other Scalemates.
25 February, 02:11
wnolder.php?lang=pl
2024-02-25 02:11:10
2019-12-04 23:58:12
60990
/ajax/wnolder.php?lang=pl&sd=2024-02-25 02:11:10&md=2019-12-04 23:58:12&filter=&w=60990
todo