scale modeling database | stash manager
Navyaircraftguy
B (Navyaircraftguy)
US

McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle "Dirty Bird"

Scale:
1:72
Status:
In progress

This F-15E is from Operation Iraqi Freedom,336th FS,AL Udied AB,Qatar 2003

Project inventory

Full kits
60783
F-15E Strike Eagle
Tamiya 1:72
60783 2012 New box
Decals
/search.php?q=*&fkMATEID[]=13701&showast=no&fkWORKBENCH[]=WB13701&page=projects&project=7260
 
 

Photoalbums

2 images
McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle "Dirty Bird" View album, image #1
1:72
I'll be doing this scheme.
1:72 F-15E Strike Eagle (Tamiya 60783)1:72 F-15E Eagles: 335th & 336th FS/ 4th FW. Operation Iraqi Freedom (Microscale 72-841)

Comments

16 March 2014, 01:36
Hunter Cummins
This will be good 🙂
16 March 2014, 13:46
B
It won't be soon though,the damn Lancaster is taking forever
16 March 2014, 13:48
Hunter Cummins
Well where are the pics then lol
gotta love lancasteres eh? 😉 😛
16 March 2014, 13:53
B
They're coming....I've been busy 😄
16 March 2014, 13:57
Hunter Cummins
Awesome
cant wait lol
16 March 2014, 14:30
B
I might start this soon. A couple current projects are almost done then I'm back to what i do best! Modern US Jets!
31 March 2014, 23:17
Hunter Cummins
Hell yea !!!!!!
Cant wait
hey you mabey wanna do a groupbuild ??
31 March 2014, 23:43
B
Modern Jet one?
31 March 2014, 23:46
Hunter Cummins
Yup
1 April 2014, 00:03
B
Sure! I'll start it on April 30th,ok? I'm currently in in the Naval Aviation GB
1 April 2014, 00:05
Hunter Cummins
Perfect as I have that and plus 2 kits on the bench for my reviews
1 April 2014, 00:22
B
Your Jaguar and Harrier both work for the GB
1 April 2014, 00:29
Hunter Cummins
Which one ??? Or will they work for both ??
1 April 2014, 00:42
B
Both,I'll make it from 1970-2014. They were both made in late 1969,but I'll accept them.
1 April 2014, 00:44
Hunter Cummins
Sweet
The harrier is still in service right ??
1 April 2014, 01:09
B
Not the one you have,but the USMC is using this: en.wikipedia.org/wik..las_AV-8B_Harrier_II the RAF is slowly phasing to F-35s though.
1 April 2014, 01:14
Hunter Cummins
So how long do you think we will keep using harriers till
1 April 2014, 01:39
B
Hmm,well the F-35 completed all sea trials. So maybe in the next 10-20 years the USMC/USN will get them. The USAF hasn't done anything that I know of with them yet. They're going to replace the F-18,F-15,A-10,and the last of the Harriers,and the F-16
1 April 2014, 01:54
Hunter Cummins
What are they gonna replace them with ??? Nothing is better than the A-10 Warhog
1 April 2014, 02:00
Hunter Cummins
In my opinion
Arent all of those aircraft like top of the line ??
1 April 2014, 02:01
B
All are being replaced by the F-35,it's a 5th generation fighter. As of now,it's the most advanced fighter in the world.
1 April 2014, 02:02
Hunter Cummins
Who came up with the design of the F-35?? (I mean country wise) I hope america makes its own kind of aircraft and tanks and makes their design. If we dont then each war will be like an endless tug of war becaise each side will know the opposing sides weaknesses
1 April 2014, 02:07
Mike Goldberg
I do think Lockheed did come up with the design. I know they had parts made by other companies, sometimes foreign, some domestic.
1 April 2014, 02:08
B
America did,it's made by Lockheed Martin. All the stuff you're talking about,like weaknesses,is all kept top secret until the aircraft is decomed.
1 April 2014, 02:09
Mike Goldberg
Even then... Most secrets about the aircraft will be kept under wraps until it's come of age much like the Mustang considering how advanced the tech is.
1 April 2014, 02:11
Hunter Cummins
Ok good
I hope we dont sell our F-35's
I figured they would be kept secret
cant wait to see the weaknesses of the A-10 F-16,14,and 15 lol
glad america is in the lead of making the nest aircraft so we can have air supporty in any conflict 😄and good thing we wont sell the F-35 🙂
1 April 2014, 02:12
B
Well,we're going to sell it to most of our closest ally's. Like Britain,Germany,and Canada.
1 April 2014, 02:14
Mike Goldberg
Well the A-10's weakness is probably age and avionics... don't see much else... Remember it's designed to fly with half the plane missing (figure of speech of course). And we have sold 35 JSF's to other countries like Korea, Japan, Israel... F-14 we don't need to worry about the weakness' because they were all decommed in 2006.
1 April 2014, 02:15
Hunter Cummins
Damn lol
atleast we dont sell our tanks and other ground vehicals
1 April 2014, 02:15
B
Yup we do....I think there's a few British Abrams,MRAPs and Bradley fighting vehicles.
1 April 2014, 02:17
Mike Goldberg
We've sold Abrams to other countries. South Korea comes to mind right now but I forgot the others. HMMWV's are sold to many, many countries. Whatever vehicle we make, we have contracts with other countries to sell to. Iran ordered up to 80 F-14 Tomcat's in the '70's and up to 714 AIM-54 Phoenix's.
1 April 2014, 02:17
B
We've sold pretty much everything government related,except the Space Shuttle....
1 April 2014, 02:19
Mike Goldberg
Along with those 'Cats they got 10 years worth of replacement parts.
1 April 2014, 02:21
Hunter Cummins
Holy shit
what the hell is wrong with thinps country lol
1 April 2014, 02:22
Mike Goldberg
Nothing. As of yet. We need to make money off the government contracts somehow.
1 April 2014, 02:23
Hunter Cummins
True true
1 April 2014, 02:24
B
We need to pay the 1.32 trillion debt to China somehow...
1 April 2014, 02:24
Mike Goldberg
And the AC-130, Brandon. We haven't sold those yet.
1 April 2014, 02:25
B
I don't think we will,those can F*** up your day and they're getting decomed soon I think.
1 April 2014, 02:26
Hunter Cummins
If we ever sold any military aircraft this is like the C-130 in any shape way or form, you know america will be screwed and wil be conquored lol
wouldnt it be easier to take over chima ??
1 April 2014, 02:26
B
Haha,no.
I think this is how we should do it. First have USN DEVGRU silently kill Kim Jong-Un. (North Korea is close ally's with China) Once he's gone a US military outpost can be set up and NK will slowly fall. Then somehow destroy Russia,it might resort to Nuclear Warheads...just turning Russia into no-mans land. Once Russia is gone,China won't have any allys that'll protect them (they're all scared of us) then invade China somehow...Nuclear weapons is once again an option. If there is no China there is no debt.
1 April 2014, 02:32
Mike Goldberg
We have sold almost all versions of the C-130 except the Spectre's. And I don't think the AC-130's are being decommed anytime soon. The loiter time, firepower, and accuracy of that weapons system makes it too valuable an asset to stuff away just yet. And no, Hunter, it would not be easier to take over China. Lol. It'd be another Vietnam... but worse.
1 April 2014, 02:33
B
You read mine above yours Mike?
1 April 2014, 02:34
Mike Goldberg
No, I didn't. I didn't reload the page after I posted. I went to a different page.
1 April 2014, 02:36
Mike Goldberg
I think what we would more likely do: First is that stuff with North Korea. Instead of just setting up an outpost there, fully invade NK. Make one unified Korea, then invade Laos or Cambodia. Make a deal with Vietnam that if they don't interfere, we'll leave them alone (they don't do anything anyway). Then, we could invade China. Then we start on Russia. If they try to interfere we send Delta or DEVGRU with Ranger's support and capture Putin and hide him away where no one will find him. Then we invade Russia and go from there.
1 April 2014, 02:40
Mike Goldberg
Hmm... Hope I didn't just kill the conversation.
1 April 2014, 02:45
B
I can tell you've been thinking about this! 😛
1 April 2014, 02:46
Mike Goldberg
Not really. Just spur of the moment.
1 April 2014, 02:48
B
Oh...ok lol. But I think your idea would work,
1 April 2014, 02:49
Mike Goldberg
Lol. Now if only they'd work in Axis and Allies...
1 April 2014, 02:51
B
Or a Ballistic missile sub can sit in one spot and launch warheads. Then it'll be all over in less than a day.
1 April 2014, 02:51
Mike Goldberg
Not really. You have to factor in counter strike capabilities. The Russians have Boomers too. The North Koreans... Well... They're working on a missle... The Chinese might have missles though. You also don't really want to cause too much in the way of collateral damage, ie.: civilians and non military targets. Thats where Tomahawks and other cruise missles and "smart" weaponry come into play. You want to cause the most amount of destruction with the least amount of civilian casualties.
1 April 2014, 02:54
B
So say if we invaded china and made it ours,what would we do with the billion citizens there?
1 April 2014, 02:55
Mike Goldberg
Nothing we can do. Against the Geneva Convention and Human Rights to commit mass genocide or to purposely displace them for no apparent reason.
1 April 2014, 02:56
B
So there'd just be a lot more Chinese-Americans?
1 April 2014, 02:58
Mike Goldberg
Well, it depends. Do we annex the country, or install a new government as we did with Japan after World War II.
1 April 2014, 02:59
B
Do we need a billion more citizens though?
1 April 2014, 03:00
Mike Goldberg
Thats the "depends" part. But this won't happen anytime soon so we have nothing to worry about.
1 April 2014, 03:01
B
Lol. I actually hope not...
1 April 2014, 03:04
Mike Goldberg
Yep.
1 April 2014, 03:05
Hunter Cummins
Take over the two world powers
you are in power and basically every other country in europe and on the sea's are out allies lol
1 April 2014, 10:33

We use cookies for a great and free experience. By continuing to browse the site you agree to our use of cookies.

Essential cookies are for: preferences, security, performance analytics and contextual advertising.

Privacy policy »   Continue