Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | N. RS-3001 | 1:35
I fatti
- Marca:
- REVOSYS
- Titolo:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Numero:
- RS-3001
- Scala:
- 1:35
- Digita:
- Kit completo
- Messo in commercio:
- 2017 Nuovo stampo
- Codice a barre:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Argomento:
- VK 3601 » Carri armati (Veicoli)
Contenuto della confezione
Plastic sprue, Fotoincisioni, Foglio di decals (applicabile con acqua)
Dimensioni:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Peso:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Genealogia
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Istruzioni
Scaricare 12024Kb (.pdf)
Mercato
Negozi online
AUD 91.50
USD 63.29Disponibile »€ 51.43
USD 58.23Esaurito »€ 56.90
USD 64.43Esaurito »€ 69.99
USD 79.25Esaurito ȴ 7120
USD 54.55Esaurito »zł 217.54
USD 57.15Esaurito »Commercio privato e scambio
SKU alternativi per REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | 4897083250011 | RVS3001 | 3001
Nota: Prezzi e disponibilità sono solo indicazioni. Controlla anche che il prodotto corrisponda effettivamente!
Prodotti correlati
Recensioni in-box
Revisioni esterne
Annuncio pubblicitario
Tutte le recensioni » (10 in totale)
Riviste
Tutte le riviste » (4 in totale)
Commenti
DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
All comments (8) » 1 6 October 2018, 06:34
Trez Mackenzie
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
Expensive to shoot, no. Expensive to build? Yes. Expensive to maintain? Yes.
10 April, 23:25
beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April, 02:11