Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | N° 1655 | 1:72

Statistiques

Marque:

Academy/Minicraft

Titre:

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Numéro:

1655

Échelle:

1:72

Type:

Maquette complète

Sorti:

1987 Nouvelle boîte

Code à barre:

048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)

Emballage:

Boîte rigide (ouverture par le haut)

Sujet:

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » Hélice (Avions)

Marquages

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2

中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

• American Volunteer Group, 3 PS Hell's Angels 68 | P-8109 (Charles Older)
  1942 World War 2 - Kunming
  FS34079 FS30219 FS36463

Contenu de la boîte

Grappes de plastique, Grappes de plastique (Clear), Décalcomanie (à l'eau)

Chronologie du produit

 

Academy

Academy/Minicraft

Sunny

Premium Hobbies

1987

 

1989

1996

199x

2014

202x

 

Nouvel outillageNouvelle boîteNouvelle boîteNouvelle boîteNouvelle boîteNouvelle boîteNouvelle boîteReboîtage

Instructions

Télécharger 2626Kb (.pdf)

Place de marché

SKU alternatifs pour Academy/Minicraft 1655:

Remarque: Les prix et la disponibilité ne sont qu'indicatifs. Vérifiez également si le produit correspond réellement!

Produits connexes

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk Academy, Frog etc

Airwaves 1:72

AC-7254 200x Nouvel outillage

I. P-40C Tomahawk / II. P-40E/F Warhawk Cockpit Placards

AIRKIT 1:72

C.015 198x Nouvel outillage

P-40B/E

TEXHOCET 1:72

72001 19xx Nouvel outillage Multi sujets (1!!)

P-40B/C Exhausts

CMK (Czech Master Kits) 1:72

Q72210 2014 Nouvel outillage

Captured Fighters in Finnish Service WW II

SBS Model 1:72

D72035 2020 Nouvel outillage Multi sujets (3)

Tous les produits associés » (121 au total)

Avis sur le contenu de la boîte

Examens externes

Examen en boîte

Modelingmadness

Projets

10 images

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

1:72

Projet: Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Commentaires

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?

21 October 2012, 09:19

Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.

21 October 2012, 10:30

Juan M Leria
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.

21 October 2012, 11:26

Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D

21 October 2012, 11:35

scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...

21 October 2012, 16:26

Matériel de référence

Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk

REFERENCES N° 25007

2024

P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk In RAF Service - Europe and North Africa

Wingleader Photo Archive N° 24

Neil Robinson

2023

Tous les livres » (82 au total) Tous les photoscopes » (23 au total)