Gloster Meteor NF.14

Sword | Nr. SW48011 | 1:48

Fakten

Marke:: Sword
Titel:: Gloster Meteor NF.14
Nummer:: SW48011
Maßstab:: 1:48
Typ:: Kompletter Bausatz
Erschienen:: 2020 Neue Bausatzform
Barcode:: 8596444480116 (EAN)
Thema:: Gloster Meteor » Jets (Flugzeuge)

Markierungen

Gloster Meteor

Gloster Meteor NF Mk.14

Royal Air Force (1918-now)

No. 72 Sqn. WS833/MS (Wg.Cdr. Maurice Shaw)
1956 - RAF Church Fenton
BS381C:241 BS381C:638 BS381C:627
No. 85 Sqn. WS776/J (Sq. Ldr. Miroslav Liškutin)
1958 - RAF Church Fenton
BS381C:241 BS381C:638 BS381C:627

Inhalt der Box

Spritzgußrahmen (Light gray), Spritzgußrahmen (Clear), Spritzgußrahmen (Light gray), Decalbogen (Nassschiebebilder) (Multi-colored)

Maße:
420x205x65 mm (16.5x8.1x2.6 inch)

Gewicht:
363 g (0.8 lbs)

Boxart entworfen von Jerry Boucher

Was ist in der Box »

Geschichte

Sword

2020

Neue Bausatzform

Gesamte Historie »

Bauanleitung

Herunterladen 7205Kb (.pdf)

Marktplatz

Onlineshops

Alle Angebote anzeigen » (12 im Total)

Alternative SKUs für Sword SW48011:
SW-48011 | 48011 | SWORD48011 | SWD48011 | SRT48011

Hinweis: Preise und Verfügbarkeit sind nur Richtwerte. Überprüfen Sie auch, ob das Produkt tatsächlich passt!

Bausatzvorstellungen

Externe Bewertungen

In-Box-Überprüfung

KFS-miniatures

In-Box-Überprüfung

Hyperscale

Rezension

KFS-miniatures

Rezension florymodels

Alle Bewertungen » (5 im Total)

Zeitschriften

Model Airplane International | 180

English (TOC: 6 lines)

July 2020

Scale Aircraft Modelling | Volume 42, Issue 11

English (TOC: 8 lines)

January 2021

Wingmasters | 143

French (TOC: 8 lines)

September-October 2021

Alle Zeitschriften » (4 im Total)

Kommentare

Gluefinger
I was just about to begin to put the decals on this thing when I realized they mis-numbered a large part of smaller decals (of which there are a lot) in the instruction sheet. Worst of all, there seems to be no logic to the mis-numbering, such as a fixed offset...
Now I have to spend hours to find out which goes where.

Thank you, Sword, for ruining what so far was a quite enjoyable build.
If you, or a test subject, had built the model just once, using your own instructions, this would immediately have become obvious.
I suggest you peruse the following Wikipedia article before p*ssing off more customers with something that is easily avoidable:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_control

1 17 October 2021, 14:00