Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | Nr. RS-3001 | 1:35

Fakten
- Marke:
- REVOSYS
- Titel:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Nummer:
- RS-3001
- Maßstab:
- 1:35
- Typ:
- Kompletter Bausatz
- Erschienen:
- 2017 Neue Bausatzform
- Barcode:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Thema:
- VK 3601 » Panzer (Fahrzeuge)
Inhalt der Box
Spritzgußrahmen, Ätzteile, Decalbogen (Nassschiebebilder)
Maße:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Gewicht:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Geschichte
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Bauanleitung
Herunterladen 12024Kb (.pdf)
Marktplatz
Onlineshops

AUD 91.50


€ 56.90


¥ 7120


zł 217.56

Privater Handel & Tausch
Alternative SKUs für REVOSYS RS-3001:
RS3001 | 3001
Hinweis: Preise und Verfügbarkeit sind nur Richtwerte. Überprüfen Sie auch, ob das Produkt tatsächlich passt!
Verwandte Produkte

WWII German Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf.C/B VK36.01 Fenders REVOSYS
Voyager Model 1:35
PE35907 2018 Neue Bausatzform Bausatzvorstellungen
Externe Bewertungen
Werbung
Alle Bewertungen » (10 im Total)
Zeitschriften
Alle Zeitschriften » (4 im Total)
Kommentare

I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34

Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April 2024, 22:28

Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April 2024, 14:15

Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April 2024, 21:15

That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April 2024, 02:11