Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | No. 1655 | 1:72

Fakta

Značka:: Academy/Minicraft
Název:: Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk
Číslo:: 1655
Měřítko:: 1:72
Typ:: Kompletní model
Vydáno:: 1987 Nová krabice
čárový kód:: 048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)
Obal:: Pevná krabice (otevírání shora)
Téma:: Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » Vrtulové (Letectvo)

Značení

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2

中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

American Volunteer Group 3 Pursuit Hell's Angels Sqn. 68 | P-8109 (Charles Older)
1942 World War 2 - Kunming
FS34079 FS30219 FS36463

Obsah krabice

Plastový rámeček (Clear), Plastový rámeček, Obtisky (mokré)

Rozměry:
190x125x40 mm (7.5x4.9x1.6 inch)

Časová osa produktu

Academy

Academy/Minicraft

Sunny

Premium Hobbies

1987

1989

1996

199x

2014

202x

Nová forma

Nová krabice

Přebal

Úplná historie »

Instrukce

Download 2626Kb (.pdf)

Obchod

Žádný z našich partnerských obchodů nebo partnerů nemá v současné době produkt na prodej.

Související produkty

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk Academy, Frog etc

Airwaves 1:72

AC-7254 200x Nová forma

I. P-40C Tomahawk / II. P-40E/F Warhawk Cockpit Placards

AIRKIT 1:72

C.015 198x Nová forma

P-40B/E

TEXHOCET 1:72

72001 19xx Nová forma Multitéma (1!!)

P-40B/C Exhausts

CMK (Czech Master Kits) 1:72

Q72210 2014 Nová forma

Captured Fighters in Finnish Service WW II

SBS Model 1:72

D72035 2020 Nová forma Multitéma (3)

Všechny související produkty » (122 celkem)

In-box recenze

Externí recenze

Kontrola v krabici

Modelingmadness

Komentáře

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?

21 October 2012, 09:19

Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.

21 October 2012, 10:30

Juan M Leria Autor
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.

21 October 2012, 11:26

Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D

21 October 2012, 11:35

scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...

21 October 2012, 16:26