Thread started by ABCAbwBtl900
Jörg Luther
Added a new review for:
Added a new review for:
8 September 2017, 06:10
Razvan Coman
I really don't understand these "reviews". BF110 was one of the most problematic Eduard kits with huge gaps when you close engine nacelles to the wings for example. Has this "new kit" solved that problem? We will never know until we buy and actually build it.
I really don't understand these "reviews". BF110 was one of the most problematic Eduard kits with huge gaps when you close engine nacelles to the wings for example. Has this "new kit" solved that problem? We will never know until we buy and actually build it.
8 September 2017, 08:43
Jörg Luther
The reviewer mentions he has already built that kit and had no problems with the nacelles on the F as with an E kit, but that the fit at the wing roots was problematic.
Generally, the rules on SCM only allow to link inbox reviews, which I personally find a bit disappointing. I often stumble over build reports with a plethora of useful infos about the kit beyond the sheer box content. Well, the bookmark manager is your friend.
The reviewer mentions he has already built that kit and had no problems with the nacelles on the F as with an E kit, but that the fit at the wing roots was problematic.
Generally, the rules on SCM only allow to link inbox reviews, which I personally find a bit disappointing. I often stumble over build reports with a plethora of useful infos about the kit beyond the sheer box content. Well, the bookmark manager is your friend.
9 September 2017, 07:37