Thread started by Flip
Phil Marchese
The B-24H kit is a rather odd listing.
The changed parts 198x timeline is inconsistent with the new tool for the B-24D, the latter having come before the H kit. The review link is dead (404 error); and in light of the lack of review, it must be mentioned that the kit is not an H series at all but a San Diego J series with some ETO modifications and the A-15 Emerson turret included. Built from the box, it does not represent a B-24H, beong absent all the features unique to the H series.
The B-24H kit is a rather odd listing.
The changed parts 198x timeline is inconsistent with the new tool for the B-24D, the latter having come before the H kit. The review link is dead (404 error); and in light of the lack of review, it must be mentioned that the kit is not an H series at all but a San Diego J series with some ETO modifications and the A-15 Emerson turret included. Built from the box, it does not represent a B-24H, beong absent all the features unique to the H series.
29 April 2017, 16:03
Augie
Well far as the name its listed under goes, its correct. Standard practice to list them as per the box details.
The date on it is a typo I think. Info i have seen says that release for this was around 98 which would make sense with the time line.
Cheers
Well far as the name its listed under goes, its correct. Standard practice to list them as per the box details.
The date on it is a typo I think. Info i have seen says that release for this was around 98 which would make sense with the time line.
Cheers
29 April 2017, 16:37
Phil Marchese
Augie, that wasn t my point at all. I understand the naming convention. My point is, in the absence of a review link, that the infornmation I provided helps a buyer make an informed decison. That is a large part of what this site provides. In a less direct way, it also serves to provide a manufacturer researching the market availability, that the subject has not really been covered. Agree?
Augie, that wasn t my point at all. I understand the naming convention. My point is, in the absence of a review link, that the infornmation I provided helps a buyer make an informed decison. That is a large part of what this site provides. In a less direct way, it also serves to provide a manufacturer researching the market availability, that the subject has not really been covered. Agree?
29 April 2017, 22:56