Thread started by El Jevi
Juan M Leria
I think we should not use the prefix mission designation (as in JA-37) in the 'topic' field for Saab aircrafts but just the model number (Saab 37 Viggen, Saab 32 Lansen...). We have now two topics for the Viggen.
I think we should not use the prefix mission designation (as in JA-37) in the 'topic' field for Saab aircrafts but just the model number (Saab 37 Viggen, Saab 32 Lansen...). We have now two topics for the Viggen.
28 May 2012, 11:59
Urban Gardini
Yes, I agree on that! The two topics on Viggen has bugged me since I first saw it but I've not said anything 'bout it.
Yes, I agree on that! The two topics on Viggen has bugged me since I first saw it but I've not said anything 'bout it.
28 May 2012, 12:26
Urban Gardini
But acording to the boxart here above it isn't a JA version at all...
But acording to the boxart here above it isn't a JA version at all...
28 May 2012, 12:27
Urban Gardini
And one thing that goes for all SAAB aircrafts n' cars as well is that the name is an acronym for Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget n' should therefore be spelled with all capital letters.
And one thing that goes for all SAAB aircrafts n' cars as well is that the name is an acronym for Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget n' should therefore be spelled with all capital letters.
28 May 2012, 12:32
Juan M Leria
That's right, but other than the logotype the own company write 'Saab' everywhere saab.com so...
That's right, but other than the logotype the own company write 'Saab' everywhere saab.com so...
28 May 2012, 14:09
Juan M Leria
Even more, in fact they are TWO companies: 'Defence and security company Saab AB and the car manufacturer, Saab Automobile AB, are two different companies with unrelated ownership structures.'
saabgroup.com/
Even more, in fact they are TWO companies: 'Defence and security company Saab AB and the car manufacturer, Saab Automobile AB, are two different companies with unrelated ownership structures.'
saabgroup.com/
28 May 2012, 14:11